Conférences PhilEAs – Hans-Johann Glock – Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Analysis: some conceptual connections

13.05.2021 18:15 – 19:15

Abstract:
Conceptual engineering is often presented as radically opposed and as superseding conceptual analysis. Prima facie, however, improving conceptual schemes in a controlled and fruitful way presupposes an understanding of the conceptual status quo. Consequently the condemnation of conceptual analysis by conceptual engineers constitutes a paradox that needs to be taken far more seriously than has been the case. One reason why the paradox has escaped notice is even more paradoxical: leading conceptual engineers like Cappelen do not believe in the existence of concepts, let alone in the possibility of changing them. By employing the tools of conceptual analysis, this article will show that this is not a tenable position. At a minimum, the projects trading under the name of conceptual engineering must aim at improving the way we categorize and reason about phenomena, rather than altering our specific beliefs and theories (as in scientific theory-formation). And this enterprise presupposes a semantic self-understanding of the kind provided by a conceptual analysis that is both connective and impure: it elucidates concepts not in isolation, but through their interconnections and their applications outside of philosophy. My arguments for this conclusion will rely on a loosely speaking pragmatist semantics. Yet this does not constitute a petitio principii, since that semantics captures the established notions of meaning and understanding that are presupposed even in semantic revisionism.

Lieu

https://unige.zoom.us/j/98773011400?pwd=a05kVlpKOFZJZDcxeXdjZjdPNGw5dz09
Meeting ID: 987 7301 1400
Passcode: 070671

entrée libre